Review: Crimson Foamposite Pro Real Vs Fake

Share Button

Fake Replica Crimson Foamposite Pro Real Vs Fake

Nike Crimson Foamposite Pro from www.replover.com

  • Quality: Fake 2.5/5
  • Appearance: 3.5/5
  • Comfort : 3.5/5
  • The Good: Decent construction, no glue marks.
  • The Bad: Creasing in foamposite material.
  • The Ugly: Wrong heel shape, tongue AIR logo outline, Plastic Carbon Fiber, Heel swoosh crooked, sole too translucent, toe box too long.

Conclusion: For the most part, replica foamposites do not do their authentic counterparts justice. The quality of the shoe was ok, no paint marks, or glue smell. RepDream (aka replover) seems to ship decent goods, but still fake.

In fact the foamposite is so far from the mark I can’t bring myself to call it a replica. It’s down right fake. The foamposite material is way too soft and easily creases. The weight difference was 10 ounces, close to a pound apart. You notice it too, as the materials just don’t feel as good as they should.

For fake foamposites they’re exactly what you’d expect. With the recent restocks, if you’re waiting on some crimson foamposites, keep your eye on our restock page and give these guys a pass.

3 thoughts on “Review: Crimson Foamposite Pro Real Vs Fake”


    Warning: call_user_func() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, function 'parallax_one_comment' not found or invalid function name in /home/nitewender/public_html/wp-includes/class-walker-comment.php on line 180

    Warning: call_user_func() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, function 'parallax_one_comment' not found or invalid function name in /home/nitewender/public_html/wp-includes/class-walker-comment.php on line 180

      Warning: call_user_func() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, function 'parallax_one_comment' not found or invalid function name in /home/nitewender/public_html/wp-includes/class-walker-comment.php on line 180

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *